Wednesday, November 22, 2006
» Install Flash Player 9 Beta
1. Grab the latest beta from Adobe
Grab the latest beta from Adobe's website, here: http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer9.html e.g. like this from a shell (no need to be root at this point):2. Uninstall the flash-player package
If you have the flash-player package installed (provided in the non-OSS repository of SUSE Linux), you'll have to uninstall it first. The following command will check whether it is installed and if it is, it will prompt you for the root password and remove it:3. Unpack the beta archive
Unpack the tar.gz archive you've just downloaded from Adobe's website and go into the subdirectory that's created by unpacking it:4. Install the plugin
Now let's install the plugin file (libflashplayer.so) into /usr/lib/browser-plugins/:5. Verify
Start Firefox, Seamonkey or whatever Mozilla browser you are using, and type the following as the URL: about:plugins On that page, you should now see an item identifying itself as "Shockwave Flash" File name: libflashplayer.so Shockwave Flash 9.0 d78Monday, November 13, 2006
» XulBooster Eclipse Plugin
» Sun relicenses Java under GPL
Sunday, November 12, 2006
» kdesu with sudo
kwriteconfig
:
Saturday, November 11, 2006
» Repository stripping
- yast2: 6.6MB to 3.8MB
- RPM-MD: 4.0MB to 2.1MB
» Another mirror for suser-guru on anorien.warwick.ac.uk
smart mirror --add http://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/misc/suser-guru/rpm/ http://anorien.warwick.ac.uk/mirrors/opensuse/guru/
» New suser-guru mirror @rwth-aachen.de
smart mirror --add http://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/misc/suser-guru/ http://ftp.halifax.rwth-aachen.de/suser-guru/
Thursday, November 09, 2006
» A call to dump SUSE Linux ? wtf
My reply to yet another piece of clueless FUD, this time calling for a boycott of SUSE Linux - just in case they don't post it.
The author forgot one reason for Novell to do the patent non-aggression pact with MS, and believe it or not, it's the right one. As you're most probably not working in an IT business of a non-negligible size nor have IT customers of that size, you don't understand how customers (well, their decision makers) think.
There is most probably no case for patent infringement in Linux distributions, be it SUSE Linux, Debian, Fedora, whatever. That is still Novell's opinion and position (as stated in the FAQ).The point is that it is not sufficient to the large number of MS shops that have been considering using Linux since some time but are afraid of potential patent litigation claims, because of all the FUD MS and SCO have been spreading.
That's why Novell made that part of the deal with MS. Novell's position is: there is currently no part of the SUSE Linux (or SLES or SLED) distribution that infringes patents, but if there is, at some point, then MS (yes, MS, not Novell, read the announcement again, as well as the FAQ) is giving you a guarantee, as a SLES/SLED customer, that they will not sue *you*. They may still sue Novell, and Novell may still sue MS for patent infringements.Now, you're calling for a boycott of a Linux distribution that is a combined effort of Novell employees and community members. Those community members have no less merit than the folks contributing to Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, whatever. This is a childish call for a distro war because you happen to like Debian and not SUSE Linux. That's fine, Debian is a great distribution, and use whatever you like, but bashing the work of people who believe in FOSS and contribute their free time on it is distasteful.
Also, it's "interesting" to see how so many people like to reduce Novell to this one agreement with MS (that is actually an agreement between MS and SLED/SLES customers) and fail to see how Novell contributes to a large number of FOSS projects (Linux kernel, OpenOffice.org, Samba, KDE, GNOME, ... ...)."This is not religious fanaticism" - this *is* religious fanaticism because all those FUD spreaders fail to read the announcement and Novell's FAQ about it. Instead, they are drawing hypothetical scenarios out of their mind and bully against a FOSS community and a business that is a major contributor to many FOSS projects.
And the point about Novell violating the GPL is just totally wrong. The GPL states that you *may not* publish source code that is known to infringe patents under the GPL unless the right to use those patents is granted to everyone who uses that source code: "Finally, any free program is threatened constantly by software patents. We wish to avoid the danger that redistributors of a free program will individually obtain patent licenses, in effect making the program proprietary. To prevent this, we have made it clear that any patent must be licensed for everyone's free use or not licensed at all." (GPL v2, Preamble)So, *if* a FOSS project contains source code that is proven to infringe a (valid) patent, the project itself violates the GPL. If the patent holder is MS, they may still sue the authors for patent infringement. If that project is included on SUSE Linux/SLED/SLES, MS may still sue Novell for patent infringement. The deal Novell has made with MS just means that if you are using SLED or SLES, MS will not sue *you* as a customer.
Wednesday, November 08, 2006
» MPlayer 1.0rc1 on Packman
Tuesday, November 07, 2006
» smart-beta 0.50rc1
smart update guru smart install smart-betaThat line should normally deinstall smart, smart-gui, smart-ksmarttray and smart-addons (if you had any of these installed), and install smart-beta-0.50rc1 instead. If you want to use the GUI, etc..., then also perform the next command:
smart update guru smart smart install smart-beta-{gui,ksmarttray,addons}If you don't want to add/enable my repository in order to use smart, there is also a standalone repository that only contains my smart and smart-beta packages: http://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/misc/suser-guru/smart/repo/SUSEVERSION where SUSEVERSION has to be replaced by 10.1, 10.0 or 9.3 (it's an rpm-md repository) Or use the mirror: http://ftp.skynet.be/pub/suser-guru/smart/repo/SUSEVERSION